Bloomington, Indiana, is taking a unique approach to selecting new parking equipment after a parking study revealed the city's parking meters had exceeded their expected lifespan. Rather than making the decision behind closed doors, the city has asked local residents, visitors, and downtown stakeholders to share their parking concerns and help evaluate which system should replace the existing meters. 

 

After hosting small-group meetings to discuss downtown parking, parking fees, policy, technology, opportunities, and goals, the city is now inviting the public to its Parking Services office to test IPS and Flowbird kiosk systems and provide feedback. The testing period will continue through August. 

 

The city believes that "parking is often the first and last impression users have of the area." While that's certainly true for visitors, the experience is just as important for residents and downtown businesses that interact with the parking system every day. Choosing the right technology is about more than purchasing equipment. It's about creating an experience that works well for everyone who uses it. That's why the city is gathering input from the very people who will rely on the system. 

 

Inviting the public to test competing parking systems before making a final decision isn't something we hear about every day. There are probably a few reasons for that. Everyone will have an opinion, and gathering public input has the potential to make the decision more complicated rather than simpler. 

 

Even so, there are clear advantages to Bloomington's approach. By asking for feedback before making a decision, the city has already made the community aware that change is coming. Residents become stakeholders in the process instead of simply being informed after the fact. If enough meaningful feedback is gathered, clear patterns may emerge, giving the city valuable insight into which system best fits the needs of the people who will use it every day. 

 

We've seen time and time again how a lack of communication and community involvement can lead to confusion and frustration when parking changes are introduced. While public input won't eliminate every complaint, it can build understanding, increase buy-in, and reduce the surprise that often accompanies significant changes. 

 

The most interesting part of this story is not whether Bloomington ultimately chooses IPS or Flowbird. The more compelling takeaway is the process itself. By inviting the people who will use the system to help evaluate it, the city is acknowledging something the TPN team talks about often: successful parking isn't just about technology. It's about the people using it. 

​

https://bloomington.in.gov/transportation/parking/rate-study